What the score measures

Each business is rated for the work it is responsible for.

Organizations that hire servers

Process servers rate payment, assignment quality, and communication.

Process-serving companies

Clients rate service quality and communication from work they hired.

A readable 1–5 scale

Every score includes a written rating, so its meaning never depends on color alone.

Balanced by design

Accountability without one-sided scorecards.

Balanced feedback mark for fair company scorecards

Reviews follow the rating areas for that business relationship, so similar profiles are easier to compare.

Every submission asks for both positive signals and points that need attention.

Moderation checks privacy, context, balance, and guideline compliance. It does not independently verify every statement.

Company scorecards

Compare businesses before you hire them or accept their work.

Organization that hires process servers

Milwaukee, WI

Professional Process Servers

1 published review

This scorecard was created from field reports submitted by process servers.

Payment speed4.9 out of 5 · Excellent
Assignment quality5.0 out of 5 · Excellent
Communication5.0 out of 5 · Excellent

Positive signal: Review the approved field reports below for positive work details.

Needs attention: Verify assignment and payment terms until more reports are available.

Overall score
5.0 out of 5 Excellent
Payment timing
1 day average
Review base
1 published
5.0 out of 5 Excellent

Excellent overall score

View scorecard

Organization that hires process servers

Corpus Christi, TX

EZ Messenger

1 published review

This scorecard was created from field reports submitted by process servers.

Payment speed1.0 out of 5 · Very poor
Assignment quality2.0 out of 5 · Poor
Communication1.0 out of 5 · Very poor

Positive signal: Review the approved field reports below for positive work details.

Needs attention: Verify assignment and payment terms until more reports are available.

Overall score
1.0 out of 5 Very poor
Payment timing
120 days average
Review base
1 published
1.0 out of 5 Very poor

Very poor overall score

View scorecard